Size the cost. Build the case.
Free, no-signup calculators and checks for HR and People leaders. Every number is transparent, uses assumptions you control, and is grounded in Indian workforce realities.
Cost-of-inaction calculator
Estimate what poor employee mental health is already costing your organisation each year, from your own headcount and salary structure.
Your organisation
Illustrative assumptions: roughly 40% of employees report work stress affecting their mental health; about 15% of working-age adults live with a mental health condition (WHO); stress-linked absenteeism and presenteeism cost in the region of 18 working days per employee a year, near 7% of payroll. Estimates, not diagnostics.
What is invisible today
200
employees likely carrying stress, anxiety or burnout signals
75
likely to need active clinical support this year
9,000
working days lost a year to absenteeism and presenteeism
₹3.15 Cr
estimated annual productivity cost
The WHO estimates every US$1 invested in scaled treatment for depression and anxiety returns about US$4 in improved health and productivity. A traditional EAP reaches fewer than 5% of the people above.
See what this looks like for your teamWellbeing ROI calculator
Build a conservative, transparent return-on-investment case for an employee wellbeing programme, with assumptions you control.
Your assumptions
The WHO and Lancet estimate roughly US$4 returned for every US$1 invested in scaled treatment of common mental disorders. This model is deliberately conservative: returns come only from recovered productive days plus a modest 2-point cut in attrition. Illustrative.
Modelled return on spend
12.1x
₹1.46 Cr back on ₹12 L invested
₹78.3 L
recovered productivity
₹67.5 L
avoided attrition cost
Attrition cost calculator
See what employee turnover actually costs you a year, and how much a few points of retention is worth.
Your numbers
Replacement cost covers recruitment, onboarding, ramp-up time and lost productivity. SHRM and Gallup commonly cite it in the range of one-half to two times annual salary, higher for senior or specialist roles. Estimate, not a quote.
Estimated annual attrition cost
₹6.08 Cr
90
people leaving a year
₹6.8 L
cost to replace one
Cut attrition by even a few points and the saving usually dwarfs the cost of the wellbeing programme that helped get there.
Model this for your teamEAP utilisation benchmark
Benchmark how many of your people your current programme actually reaches, against a whole-person platform.
Benchmark your reach
Industry figures commonly put traditional EAP utilisation under 5%, sometimes counted generously as “eligible lives” rather than active users. Ask any vendor for active usage, not eligibility.
960
people your current model is unlikely to reach this year
Team burnout self-assessment
A two-minute reflective check across the three WHO burnout dimensions: exhaustion, cynicism and reduced efficacy.
Exhaustion
By the end of most weeks, my team seems emotionally drained.
Psychological safety check
Rate your team on the dimensions Edmondson and Project Aristotle found most predict performance, and find where to start.
Rate your team
0/7 answeredOn my team, it is safe to admit a mistake without it being held against you.
People can raise problems and hard questions openly.
It is easy to ask others on this team for help.
Members of this team are able to bring up issues outside their own role.
No one on this team would deliberately undermine someone else's effort.
People feel able to take a considered risk or share a half-formed idea.
Differences of opinion are welcomed, not penalised.
Presenteeism cost estimator
Estimate the productivity quietly lost when people are present but unwell, the leak that does not show up on any leave record.
Estimate the leak
Presenteeism is hard to see and harder to measure, so treat this as a directional estimate. Research consistently finds it costs employers more than absenteeism, because it is constant rather than occasional. Illustrative.
Estimated annual presenteeism cost
₹2.7 Cr
30
full-time-equivalent output quietly lost, even with everyone at their desks
The drivers are addressable: distress, poor sleep, financial worry and chronic pain. Treat the cause and the leak narrows.
EAP vs modern platform comparison
Compare a traditional EAP with a whole-person platform across engagement, care, data and accountability.
Ask any vendor, including us, for active usage rather than eligible lives, and for the leading indicators they can show you, not just a count of calls.
See what these numbers look like for your team
Book a demo and we will walk your own headcount through the model, and show you the platform your people would actually use.
Book a demo
